Skip to main content
Back to brief

Politics · October 19, 2026

UNC Settles Trump Probes of Race in Admissions, Civil Rights

3 sources →

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) has reached a voluntary settlement with the U.S. government to resolve 18 Department of Education investigations and a Department of Justice compliance review involving alleged antisemitism and race-based admissions. Under the agreement, which lasts through 2028, UNC will maintain race-blind policies for admissions and financial aid, appoint a Title VI Coordinator, provide mandatory antisemitism training, and prohibit face masks used to conceal identity during protests. The university does not admit wrongdoing, and no monetary payment was required. The settlement follows a broader administration push against diversity initiatives and campus protests following the 2023 Supreme Court ruling against affirmative action.

Read the original coverage

Reported across the spectrum

  • UNC reached a voluntary settlement closing 18 federal investigations and one DOJ compliance review.
  • The settlement involves alleged antisemitism and race discrimination.
  • UNC is not required to make a monetary payment and does not admit liability.
  • A Title VI Coordinator and Merit & Civil Rights Administrator (Elizabeth Hall) have been appointed.
  • UNC must adopt a color-blind admissions system and race-blind policies for student benefits and scholarships.
  • The agreement mandates antisemitism training for students and staff.
  • UNC will prohibit face masks used to conceal identity, with some exceptions.
  • UNC will report complaints of antisemitism and race discrimination to the DOJ and Education Department quarterly.

Reported by only some outlets

  • Columbia University previously settled federal probes for over $200 million.
  • Brown University agreed to provide $50 million for workforce development as part of its settlement.
  • Harvard has not yet reached a deal with the administration.

CadNews does not determine absolute truth or endorse political viewpoints. It compares publicly available reporting, identifies shared facts, highlights framing differences, and flags uncertainty.