Skip to main content
Back to brief
Archived story · published November 5, 2026. Coverage reflects reporting at the time. See today's brief

Politics · November 5, 2026

Trump: Sen. Sullivan should get votes cast for Alaska's other Sullivan

7 sources →

FreeGet stories like this compared, every morning at 7.

President Trump called for the votes cast for two minor candidates in the Alaska Senate race to be awarded to incumbent Republican Senator Dan Sullivan. On Truth Social, Trump referred to candidates Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. and Gerald Heikes as a 'Fake Dan Sullivan' and a 'slug,' respectively, arguing their totals should be given to the 'REAL Dan Sullivan' to end the election. The race between Senator Sullivan and Democratic challenger Mary Peltola remains too close to call under Alaska's ranked-choice voting system, where Peltola holds a narrow lead in initial counts. Republicans have alleged that the second Sullivan was recruited as a 'spoiler' candidate to confuse voters, a claim Peltola’s campaign denies.

Read the original coverage

Reported across the spectrum

  • President Trump posted on Truth Social demanding that votes for other candidates be given to incumbent Senator Dan Sullivan.
  • The Alaska Senate race involves two candidates named Dan Sullivan: the incumbent and Daniel J. Sullivan Jr.
  • Mary Peltola is the Democratic challenger in the race.
  • Alaska uses a ranked-choice voting system.
  • The election remains unresolved with no winner declared as of the reporting.

Reported by only some outlets

  • Peltola leads with 48.17% to Sullivan's 47.88%.
  • Gerald Heikes is the third-place candidate with 2.27% of the vote.
  • Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. received 1.68% of the vote.
  • The Department of Justice has previously looked into the presence of the second Sullivan on the ballot.
  • Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. is a retired teacher.

FreeDaily Brief newsletter

Get the 5-minute Daily Brief, with the topics you pick.

The Daily Brief is free

CadNews does not determine absolute truth or endorse political viewpoints. It compares publicly available reporting, identifies shared facts, highlights framing differences, and flags uncertainty.