Politics · October 19, 2026
Supreme court rejects effort to revive plea deal for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in 9/11 attacks

The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and two co-defendants to revive plea agreements that would have removed the death penalty for their roles in the September 11 attacks. The ruling upholds a decision by former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, who revoked the deals in 2024 shortly after they were approved by the Pentagon's convening authority for military commissions. The defendants argued that Austin exceeded his authority by intervening in the deals. The high court's refusal to hear the case leaves the government's withdrawal of the deals in place, moving the defendants toward a military commission trial currently scheduled for June 2028.
Read the original coverage
Supreme Court Will Not Revive Plea Deal for Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and 9/11 Defendants
Read at The New York Times ↗- NBC NewsCenter-left
Supreme Court rejects alleged 9/11 mastermind’s attempt to revive plea deal
Read at NBC News ↗ - ABC NewsCenter-left
Supreme Court rejects effort to revive Khalid Sheikh Mohammed plea deal
Read at ABC News ↗ - CBS NewsCenter-left
Supreme Court turns away appeal from alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
Read at CBS News ↗ - New York PostRight
Supreme Court rejects bid by 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to revive controversial plea deal
Read at New York Post ↗ Supreme Court Rejects Sept. 11 Defendants on Scuttled Plea Deals
Read at Bloomberg Politics ↗- The GuardianCenter-left
Supreme court rejects effort to revive plea deal for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in 9/11 attacks
Read at The Guardian ↗ - AxiosCenter-left
Supreme Court won't revive accused 9/11 mastermind's plea deal
Read at Axios ↗ - Washington TimesCenter-right
Supreme Court rejects effort to revive Khalid Sheikh Mohammed plea deal
Read at Washington Times ↗ - Just the NewsRight
Supreme Court upholds Pentagon decision to toss plea deal for alleged 9/11 conspirators
Read at Just the News ↗
Reported across the spectrum
- The Supreme Court declined to review the appeal regarding the plea deals.
- The defendants involved are Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Mustafa al-Hawsawi, and Walid bin 'Atash.
- The 2024 plea deals would have exchanged guilty pleas for life sentences without the possibility of parole, avoiding the death penalty.
- Former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin revoked the agreements after they were initially approved.
- A trial for the defendants is currently set for 2028.
- Legal delays in the case have been caused by issues surrounding evidence obtained through CIA 'enhanced interrogation' or torture.
Reported by only some outlets
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh did not participate in the Supreme Court's consideration of the appeal.
- The Trump administration has reportedly backed the decision to revoke the deals.
- A military judge in 2024 initially ruled that Austin's nullification of the deals was unlawful before an appeals court overturned that finding.
- The plea deals required the accused to answer questions from family members of survivors during public sentencing.
- Brigadier General Susan Escallier was the convening authority who originally approved the deals.
Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize…
The Guardian highlights that 9/11 victims' families were split on the plea deal, noting that some saw it as the best hope for bringing a long and painful case to a conclusion.
Right-leaning outlets tend to emphasize…
Where coverage diverges
Single-perspective coverage; cross-spectrum comparison limited.
About these outlets
CadNews does not determine absolute truth or endorse political viewpoints. It compares publicly available reporting, identifies shared facts, highlights framing differences, and flags uncertainty.
