Skip to main content
Back to brief

Sports · October 18, 2026

Rams’ season hits new low after stunning last-second Cardinals loss

4 sources →

The Arizona Cardinals defeated the Los Angeles Rams 18-16 in a significant upset on October 18, 2026. The Rams, once preseason Super Bowl favorites, fell to 2-4 after Cardinals kicker Chad Ryland made his sixth field goal of the game as time expired. The Rams had taken a one-point lead with 47 seconds remaining following a Matthew Stafford touchdown pass and an emergency extra point by punter Ethan Evans. However, Arizona's final drive was aided by a 21-yard completion on a free play and a controversial unnecessary roughness penalty on Rams cornerback Josh Wallace. The Rams also played most of the game without kicker Blake Grupe, who injured his knee on a first-quarter kickoff tackle.

Read the original coverage

Reported by multiple outlets

  • The Arizona Cardinals defeated the Los Angeles Rams 18-16 on a walk-off field goal.
  • Chad Ryland made six field goals for Arizona and no touchdowns were scored by the Cardinals.
  • Rams kicker Blake Grupe was injured in the first quarter making a tackle on a kickoff return.
  • Matthew Stafford threw a touchdown pass to Colby Parkinson with 47 seconds remaining to take a 16-15 lead.
  • Punter Ethan Evans successfully kicked the go-ahead extra point for the Rams.
  • Arizona was a 13.5-point underdog entering the game.
  • Rams cornerback Josh Wallace was flagged for unnecessary roughness on the final drive.

Reported by only some outlets

  • Matthew Stafford finished 25-for-33 for 222 yards and two touchdowns.
  • The Cardinals defense recorded three sacks and limited Stafford to 4.2 yards per attempt for much of the game.
  • The Rams offense committed several errors including a Tyler Higbee fumble and a failed fourth-and-1 run by tight end Davis Allen.
  • The Rams defense has recorded only eight sacks through six games this season.
  • Jacoby Brissett threw one interception on the Cardinals' opening possession.

CadNews does not determine absolute truth or endorse political viewpoints. It compares publicly available reporting, identifies shared facts, highlights framing differences, and flags uncertainty.