Skip to main content
Back to brief

Politics · November 11, 2026

House petition for new Epstein files bill gets enough support to force vote

5 sources →

FreeGet stories like this compared, every morning at 7.

Republican Representative Thomas Massie has secured the 218 signatures required for a discharge petition to force a House floor vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act II. The legislation seeks to compel the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release remaining files related to Jeffrey Epstein, including over 3 million documents Massie claims are being unlawfully withheld or excessively redacted. The petition succeeded through the support of all House Democrats and four Republicans: Massie, Brian Fitzpatrick (misspelled as Fitzgerald in some reports), Nancy Mace, and Ralph Norman. This marks the second time Massie has used this procedural maneuver to bypass House leadership on the issue of Epstein file transparency.

Read the original coverage

Reported across the spectrum

  • A discharge petition for the Epstein Files Transparency Act II reached 218 signatures.
  • Rep. Thomas Massie led the effort to force a floor vote and bypass GOP leadership.
  • The petition was signed by all House Democrats and four Republicans.
  • The legislation aims to compel the release of Justice Department files related to Jeffrey Epstein.
  • The bill allows members of Congress, state attorneys general, and Epstein survivors to sue the DOJ for non-compliance.

Reported by only some outlets

  • Rep. John Garamendi was the decisive 218th signature.
  • Rep. Adam Smith was the 217th signature.
  • Rep. Ro Khanna co-led the discharge petition effort with Massie.
  • The DOJ is allegedly withholding over 3 million Epstein files.
  • Massie was defeated in his GOP primary earlier this year by a candidate backed by President Donald Trump.
  • A similar discharge petition maneuver was successfully used nearly a year ago.

FreeDaily Brief newsletter

Get the 5-minute Daily Brief, with the topics you pick.

The Daily Brief is free

CadNews does not determine absolute truth or endorse political viewpoints. It compares publicly available reporting, identifies shared facts, highlights framing differences, and flags uncertainty.