Skip to main content
CadNews - Comparative News Analysis
Topics
Sign in
Back to brief

Crypto · November 11, 2026

Nvidia perps plunge 10% on Hyperliquid as board reportedly weighs ousting Jensen Huang

4 sources →

FreeGet stories like this compared, every morning at 7.

Nvidia's board of directors is reportedly considering the removal of CEO Jensen Huang. Reports citing the Wall Street Journal suggest the board could meet as early as today to decide Huang's future at the company. Following these reports, perpetual futures for Nvidia on the Hyperliquid platform experienced significant price declines. The reports indicate the potential ousting may be related to allegations involving two extramarital affairs.

Read the original coverage

Hype check

How the hype check works

Confirmed · 0

Backed by filings, on-chain data, official statements or several independent publishers.

  • None identified.

Claimed · 1

Said by a company, project or person; not yet independently confirmed.

  • Nvidia's board is preparing to oust CEO Jensen Huang over two extramarital affairs (Wall Street Journal)

Speculation · 2

Price talk, forecasts or unnamed sources, quoted as someone else's view.

  • The board could meet as soon as today to decide the CEO's future (Wall Street Journal)
  • Nvidia perps crashed as traders reacted to reports of the CEO's removal (CoinDesk)

Reported by multiple outlets

  • The Wall Street Journal reported that Nvidia's board is preparing to oust CEO Jensen Huang.
  • Nvidia perpetual futures on the Hyperliquid platform declined in value following the news.

Reported by only some outlets

  • Nvidia's board could meet as soon as today to decide Huang's future, as reported by Cointelegraph.
  • The Block reported the board's decision is tied to two extramarital affairs.
  • The Block reported a 10% plunge in Nvidia perps, while CoinDesk reported a 7% crash.

FreeDaily Brief newsletter

Get the 5-minute Daily Brief, with the topics you pick.

The Daily Brief is free

About these outlets

CadNews does not determine absolute truth or endorse political viewpoints. It compares publicly available reporting, identifies shared facts, highlights framing differences, and flags uncertainty.