Skip to main content
Back to brief

Crypto · November 2, 2026

No proof of AI in North Korean hackers move of stolen Binance funds

3 sources →

Following a major security breach at the cryptocurrency exchange Binance, for which the FBI has identified North Korean state-backed group TraderTraitor as responsible, investigation into the movement of the stolen assets continues. Recent analysis by blockchain security firm Elliptic indicates that the subsequent movement of these funds through thousands of wallets was likely facilitated by automated scripts rather than advanced artificial intelligence agents, as evidenced by repetitive patterns and failed transactions.

Read the original coverage

Confirmed · 2

Backed by filings, on-chain data, official statements or several independent publishers.

  • The FBI attributed the hack to North Korea (FBI)
  • Binance froze a portion of the stolen funds (Binance)

Claimed · 2

Said by a company, project or person; not yet independently confirmed.

  • 95% of losses have been covered by company funds (Binance)
  • Withdrawal levels are stabilizing at 3% of total assets (Binance)

Speculation · 1

Price talk, forecasts or unnamed sources, quoted as someone else's view.

  • Hackers relied on scripts rather than AI agents (Elliptic)

Reported by multiple outlets

  • The FBI identified North Korean hackers as the perpetrators of the Binance hack.
  • The FBI named the specific group involved as TraderTraitor.
  • Binance initially paused customer withdrawals following the incident.
  • Binance has committed to covering customer losses in full.

Reported by only some outlets

  • New York Post reports Binance has already covered 95% of losses using company funds.
  • CoinDesk reports that blockchain firm Elliptic found no evidence of AI agents in the fund movements.
  • New York Post reports the hack was first detected on a Thursday evening.

FreeDaily Brief newsletter

Get the 5-minute Daily Brief, with the topics you pick.

The Daily Brief is free

CadNews does not determine absolute truth or endorse political viewpoints. It compares publicly available reporting, identifies shared facts, highlights framing differences, and flags uncertainty.