Politics · October 29, 2026
Judge denies feds' request to block 20,000 California ballots in blistering opinion

U.S. District Judge David O. Carter rejected a Department of Justice (DOJ) request to force California election officials to sequester approximately 20,000 mail-in ballots before the November 3 midterm elections. The DOJ sought to isolate these ballots based on claims they were submitted by non-citizens. Judge Carter ruled that the federal government's request violated constitutional principles of state sovereignty over elections and warned that granting the emergency intervention would cause chaos and potential disenfranchisement just days before the vote. This ruling follows a procedural dismissal by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals earlier in the week, though the underlying lawsuit remains active.
Read the original coverage
- Associated PressAllSides: Lean LeftMBFC: Left-Center
Judge denies federal request to segregate California ballots, says it would 'wreak havoc' on voting
Read at Associated Press ↗ Judge Rejects Trump Officials’ Bid to Set Aside California Ballots
Read at The New York Times ↗Judge rejects Justice Department bid to set aside California ballots
Read at Washington Post ↗- NBC NewsMBFC: Left-Center
Judge denies Trump administration request to segregate alleged noncitizen ballots in California
Read at NBC News ↗ - New York PostAllSides: Right (News)MBFC: Right-Center
Feds launch immediate appeal after judge rejects bid to stop California from counting 20K disputed ballots
Read at New York Post ↗ - ABC NewsMBFC: Left-Center
Judge rejects Trump admin request for order to segregate 20,000 Calif. ballots
Read at ABC News ↗ - CBS NewsMBFC: Right-Center
Judge rejects Trump administration
Read at CBS News ↗ - NPRMBFC: Left-Center
Judge denies the Justice Department's bid to stop processing California ballots
Read at NPR ↗ Judge Says US Bid to Block 20,000 Votes Would ‘Wreak Havoc’
Read at Bloomberg ↗- The GuardianMBFC: Left-Center
Judge rebuffs Trump DoJ’s bid to force California to set aside 20,000 ballots
Read at The Guardian ↗ - The HillMBFC: Least Biased
DOJ's California ballot fight rejected by another judge
Read at The Hill ↗ - MSNBCMBFC: Left
Judge denies DOJ demand that California set aside mail ballots from more than 20,000 ‘likely noncitizens’
Read at MSNBC ↗ - Washington ExaminerMBFC: Right-Center
Judge denies DOJ bid to isolate 20,000 California mail ballots
Read at Washington Examiner ↗ - Washington TimesMBFC: Right-Center
Judge says California can count ballots of 20,000 suspected noncitizens
Read at Washington Times ↗ - CalMattersAllSides: CenterMBFC: Left-Center
Federal judge cites 'attempted election interference'; rejects setting aside California ballots
Read at CalMatters ↗ - Raw StoryMBFC: Left
Judge goes nuclear while blocking DOJ's California voter plot: 'These threats must stop'
Read at Raw Story ↗ - Los Angeles TimesMBFC: Least Biased
Judge denies feds' request to block 20,000 California ballots in blistering opinion
Read at Los Angeles Times ↗ - The Epoch TimesMBFC: Right-Center
Federal Judge Denies DOJ Bid to Isolate Challenged California Ballots Ahead of Midterms
Read at The Epoch Times ↗ - NewsweekMBFC: Right-Center
Judge Denies DOJ Request to Halt Counting of California Ballots
Read at Newsweek ↗ - HuffPostMBFC: Left
Federal Judge Rules Against Trump Admin In Dispute With California Over Alleged Noncitizen Ballots
Read at HuffPost ↗
Reported across the spectrum
- U.S. District Judge David O. Carter rejected the Department of Justice's request to segregate approximately 20,000 California mail ballots.
- The Department of Justice claimed the targeted ballots were associated with individuals who may not be U.S. citizens.
- The ruling occurred on Wednesday, October 28, ahead of the November 3 midterm elections.
- Judge Carter's decision cited state sovereignty and the potential for election disruption as reasons for the denial.
- The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had previously dismissed an emergency appeal on procedural grounds.
Reported by only some outlets
- Judge David Carter was appointed by President Bill Clinton.
- The DOJ provided Sacramento and Los Angeles officials with a USB drive containing names of suspected non-citizens roughly two weeks prior.
- California has more than 23 million registered voters.
- Federal prosecutor Bill Essayli indicated plans to appeal to the 9th Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court.
- The DOJ alleged California failed to meet a deadline to complete a review of the suspected non-citizens.
Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize…
emphasize that the DOJ request appeared designed to cast doubt on election results and portray the move as a threat to the rights of 20,000 citizens. Most coverage highlights the judge's sharp criticism of the administration's 'coercion' and the 'legally thin' nature of the request.
Right-leaning outlets tend to emphasize…
detail the specific procedural steps of the DOJ's legal challenge and the arguments regarding suspected non-citizen voting. These outlets note that while the emergency request was denied, the broader lawsuit remains alive.
Centrist outlets tend to focus on…
focus on the legal conflict between federal intervention and state sovereignty. These outlets highlight the judge's warning that the DOJ's request would 'wreak havoc' on the election process and document the ruling as a specific legal setback for the administration.
Where coverage diverges
Coverage diverges along left/right lines — see Framing tab for specifics.
FreeDaily Brief newsletter
Get the 5-minute Daily Brief, with the topics you pick.
The Daily Brief is free
About these outlets
- CBS NewsMBFC: Right-Center
- The GuardianMBFC: Left-Center
- BloombergAllSides: CenterMBFC: Left-Center
- NBC NewsMBFC: Left-Center
- NPRMBFC: Left-Center
- CalMattersAllSides: CenterMBFC: Left-Center
- Associated PressAllSides: Lean LeftMBFC: Left-Center
- The HillMBFC: Least Biased
- Raw StoryMBFC: Left
- Washington ExaminerMBFC: Right-Center
- ABC NewsMBFC: Left-Center
- Los Angeles TimesMBFC: Least Biased
- The New York TimesAllSides: Lean Left (News)MBFC: Left-Center
- The Epoch TimesMBFC: Right-Center
- NewsweekMBFC: Right-Center
- HuffPostMBFC: Left
- New York PostAllSides: Right (News)MBFC: Right-Center
- The Washington PostAllSides: Lean Left (News)MBFC: Left-Center
- MSNBCMBFC: Left
- The Washington TimesMBFC: Right-Center
CadNews does not determine absolute truth or endorse political viewpoints. It compares publicly available reporting, identifies shared facts, highlights framing differences, and flags uncertainty.
