Skip to main content
Back to brief

Politics · October 28, 2026

Federal judge disqualifies Trump-appointed prosecutor for ‘unlawfully serving’ in role

4 sources →

A federal judge has ruled that Bill Essayli, the top federal prosecutor for the Central District of California, is serving unlawfully in his role as a "de facto" U.S. attorney. The court disqualified him from overseeing at least two criminal prosecutions, finding that his tenure bypassed the constitutionally required Senate confirmation process. Essayli, an appointee of President Trump, initially served in an interim capacity before being transitioned to "first assistant" roles that allowed him to lead the office without a formal nomination. The Department of Justice has expressed its intent to appeal the ruling, which has been stayed to allow for that process. Simultaneously, Essayli is involved in a separate legal challenge regarding California's voter rolls, where another federal judge expressed skepticism over DOJ efforts to segregate 20,000 ballots belonging to suspected noncitizens just before the midterm elections.

Read the original coverage

Reported across the spectrum

  • Bill Essayli was disqualified by a federal judge from overseeing specific criminal cases in Southern California.
  • The judge ruled that Essayli was serving 'unlawfully' in his capacity.
  • The disqualification order has been stayed pending a Department of Justice appeal.
  • Essayli was never confirmed by the U.S. Senate for his role as U.S. attorney.
  • The ruling found Essayli to be acting as a 'de facto' U.S. attorney despite his 'first assistant' title.

Reported by only some outlets

  • The Guardian reports the ruling affects two criminal prosecutions, while Raw Story describes it as 'several cases'.
  • ABC News reports that Judge David O. Carter intended to appoint a special master to investigate the DOJ's list of 20,000 suspected noncitizen voters.
  • Fox News and The Guardian specify that Essayli became an interim U.S. attorney in April 2025.
  • ABC News notes that Judge Carter appeared skeptical of the DOJ's late-stage intervention in California's election administration.

CadNews does not determine absolute truth or endorse political viewpoints. It compares publicly available reporting, identifies shared facts, highlights framing differences, and flags uncertainty.