Skip to main content
CadNews - Comparative News Analysis
Topics
Sign in
Back to brief

Entertainment · October 25, 2026

Emily Osment reveals reason she requested intimacy coordinator for kissing scenes with ‘Young Sheldon’ co-star Montana Jordan

4 sources →

Emily Osment, who played Mandy McAllister on 'Young Sheldon,' requested an intimacy coordinator for her scenes with co-star Montana Jordan due to their age gap. Osment was approximately 30 years old when she joined the series, while Jordan was 18. According to accounts from Jessica Radloff’s book, 'Young Sheldon: The (Juicier-Than-Meemaw’s-Brisket) Inside Story of the Hit Comedy,' Osment felt uncomfortable with the age difference and wanted to ensure Jordan was also comfortable during their kissing scenes. While a coordinator could not be secured for the first day of shooting, one was provided for subsequent episodes as their characters' relationship progressed.

Read the original coverage

Reported by multiple outlets

  • Emily Osment requested an intimacy coordinator for scenes with Montana Jordan on the set of 'Young Sheldon.'
  • The request was motivated by the age gap between the actors; Osment was around 30 and Jordan was 18 at the time.
  • Osment described Jordan as 'a baby with a mullet' when explaining her discomfort.
  • A coordinator was not available for the initial request but was present for later episodes.
  • The information was revealed in Jessica Radloff's book, 'Young Sheldon: The (Juicier-Than-Meemaw’s-Brisket) Inside Story of the Hit Comedy.'
  • Osment spoke to producer Tim Marx about the request.

Reported by only some outlets

  • Deadline reports Osment was 29 at the time of filming, while others report her age as 30.
  • The New York Post cites director Alex Reid acknowledging the production 'totally dropped the ball' regarding the absence of a coordinator.
  • The New York Post reports Osment's specific concern that Jordan might 'eat his discomfort' rather than ask for a coordinator himself.

About these outlets

CadNews does not determine absolute truth or endorse political viewpoints. It compares publicly available reporting, identifies shared facts, highlights framing differences, and flags uncertainty.