Skip to main content
Back to brief
Archived story · published November 4, 2026. Coverage reflects reporting at the time. See today's brief

Politics · November 4, 2026

Cooke wins Wisconsin seat in rematch; Berman beats Steil

4 sources →

FreeGet stories like this compared, every morning at 7.

In a series of Wisconsin congressional rematches, Democrat Rebecca Cooke defeated incumbent Republican Derrick Van Orden in the 3rd Congressional District, while Democrat Mitchell Berman unseated Republican incumbent Bryan Steil in the 1st Congressional District. Cooke’s victory flips a seat previously held by Van Orden, who won their 2024 encounter by less than three percentage points. Cooke’s win was characterized by significant margins in urban areas like Eau Claire and La Crosse, which offset Republican strength in rural counties. Meanwhile, Berman, an emergency room nurse, defeated Steil, the chairman of the Committee on House Administration, in another close contest.

Read the original coverage

Reported across the spectrum

  • Rebecca Cooke defeated Derrick Van Orden in Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District.
  • The race was a rematch of the 2024 election.
  • Cooke received 52.4% of the vote while Van Orden received 45.8% at the time the race was called.
  • Van Orden conceded the race to Cooke.
  • Mitchell Berman defeated incumbent Bryan Steil in the 1st Congressional District.

Reported by only some outlets

  • The AP called the race for Cooke at 11:48 p.m. with 90% of the vote counted.
  • The AP called the race for Cooke at 12:48 a.m. with 91% of the vote counted.
  • Cooke won Eau Claire and La Crosse counties by more than 20 points.
  • Van Orden led only a single county, Adams, by more than 20 points as of 11:45 p.m.
  • Berman declared victory just after 11 p.m., while Steil conceded around 11:30 p.m.
  • Van Orden previously won the 2024 race against Cooke by 2.7 percentage points.

FreeDaily Brief newsletter

Get the 5-minute Daily Brief, with the topics you pick.

The Daily Brief is free

CadNews does not determine absolute truth or endorse political viewpoints. It compares publicly available reporting, identifies shared facts, highlights framing differences, and flags uncertainty.