Politics · October 25, 2026
Appeals court to hear arguments in Trump admin's voting suit against California

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held a rare Sunday hearing to consider an emergency request by the Justice Department to segregate approximately 20,000 mail-in ballots in California. The Trump administration argues these ballots are tied to suspected noncitizens, while California officials contend the list is unverified and contains lawful voters. During the nearly two-hour session, the judges expressed skepticism regarding the federal government's jurisdiction to intervene in state election processes and whether the court could act before a district court ruling. No immediate decision was reached, though a ruling is expected shortly.
Read the original coverage
- ABC NewsMBFC: Left-Center
Federal appeals court hears arguments in Trump administration's voting lawsuit against California
Read at ABC News ↗ - The HillMBFC: Least Biased
Appeals court resists DOJ's bid to immediately segregate 20k California ballots
Read at The Hill ↗ - Los Angeles TimesMBFC: Least Biased
9th Circuit panel questions basis for feds' request to block 20,000 California ballots
Read at Los Angeles Times ↗ - Raw StoryMBFC: Left
Trump DOJ lawyers scolded by skeptical judges in ballot case:
Read at Raw Story ↗ - Fox NewsAllSides: Right (Digital)MBFC: Right
Ninth Circuit questions Trump DOJ's emergency request to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots
Read at Fox News ↗
Reported across the spectrum
- The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held a rare Sunday hearing regarding the Trump administration's lawsuit against California.
- The Justice Department is seeking to segregate roughly 20,000 ballots belonging to individuals it suspects are noncitizens.
- The hearing lasted approximately two hours.
- The three-judge panel includes two Trump appointees and one Biden appointee.
- No immediate ruling was issued following the arguments.
Reported by only some outlets
- The Justice Department requested a ruling by Tuesday prior to a scheduled district court hearing.
- Recent DOJ charges include 28 individuals from the suspect list accused of voting and immigration violations.
- The DOJ filed a separate lawsuit in Alaska involving incumbent GOP Sen. Dan Sullivan.
- The administration claims the district judge did not act quickly enough to address their allegations.
Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize…
characterize the lawsuit as an attempt to 'inject' the federal government into state counting processes and link the legal action to 'baseless claims' of massive voter fraud.
Right-leaning outlets tend to emphasize…
highlight the government's concern that hundreds of thousands of ballots are being tabulated daily while the dispute over potential noncitizen voters remains unresolved.
Centrist outlets tend to focus on…
emphasize the judges' skepticism regarding the legal basis of the DOJ's request and the rare nature of the Sunday emergency hearing.
Where coverage diverges
Coverage diverges along left/right lines — see Framing tab for specifics.
About these outlets
CadNews does not determine absolute truth or endorse political viewpoints. It compares publicly available reporting, identifies shared facts, highlights framing differences, and flags uncertainty.
